How The Rossen Law Firm Has Used Body Worn Cameras To Win Criminal And Dui Cases
DUI Case with .159 breath test results in acquittal at trial.
In July 2018, I got a call from a man named Norbert, who said that he was arrested for Driving Under the Influence in the South Florida area. Norbert was pulled over for failing to slow down next to an emergency vehicle, as well as rapidly accelerating at a green light. The police reported that Norbert was visibly drunk, with bloodshot eyes. Norbert agreed to complete DUI Field Sobriety Test Exercises, telling the police officer that he was bitten by a shark in his butt that impaired his walking abilities. Nevertheless, the police officers had Norbert complete Field Sobriety Exercises, which were altered due to his accident. Upon further examination of the body camera footage, it was clear to me that Norbert did not have bloodshot eyes and that his normal walk matched how he completed the exercises. I was able to use this footage in court, showing how the body camera footage did not match up to the polices story. Because of my emphasis on the contradictory body camera video, Norbert was found not guilty in court.
Man arrested for possession with intent to distribute marijuana reduced to a misdemeanor after contradictory body camera evidence.
Man arrested with pounds of marijuana cleared after body camera evidence shows the police violated his rights.
If you, or someone you know, is arrested…
Opinion: All Federal Law Enforcement Should Wear Body Cameras
Elliot Williams was a deputy assistant attorney general at the Justice Department from 2013 to 2017.
If there is anythingthe nationhas learned since the death of George Floyd, it is that the presence of cameras during law enforcement encounters can be an instrument of justice. Live cameras at the scene can both expose police misconduct and provide officers with clearevidence of wrongdoing by members of the public.
Earlier this week, by vastly expanding the use of body-worn cameras by its personnel, the Justice Department took a critical step toward a more equitable and reliable criminal justice system. However, it wasnt enough, and its high time the rest of the vast federal government law enforcement apparatus, whose members are often armed, followed suit.
In a memo issued Monday, Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco directed the heads of the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration, Marshals Service and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives to issue policies within a month about outfitting officers with cameras.
It is time the rest of the federal governments police forces joined them.
Read more:
Why Body Cameras Are Good For The Prosecutor
Body cameras can also be a secret weapon for the State in court. Body cameras are supposed to capture all video and audio and may reveal certain events that were omitted from the police report. If a defendant has slurred speech or is argumentative with an officer, the camera will show details that were previously subjective. A defendants actions are also emphasized with the addition of body camera footage, like if a defendant is constantly cursing or yelling. These can be used to define character and tell a story in court, sometimes painting the defendant in an even worse light. It is important to always be polite, calm, and respectful with the police officer you are interacting with no matter what, especially so that the body camera footage cannot be used against you in any way shape or form.
Recommended Reading: Can You Check Police Reports Online
Police Body Cameras Can Be A Positive Accountability Tool But They Can Also Invade Our Privacy
, author of Police Visibility: Privacy, Surveillance, and the False Promise of Body-Worn Cameras
Police body-worn cameras do have the potential to make police work, including misconduct and police violence, more visible. However, they can also lead to significant invasions of individual privacy.
It was the summer of 2014 when I began studying the adoption and use of body-worn cameras by two municipal police agencies in Washington State. Over the next few years, I spent many hours riding in patrol vehicles and hanging out at police stations, interviewing officers and observing them while they worked. I also administered surveys of police officer perceptions of these cameras. One of the most striking findings from my research was that these body cameras held the potential to invade the most private and sensitive moments of peoples livesand the same laws that enabled oversight and accountability of the police also forced private citizens into the public view, often with little or no corresponding social benefit.
In my new book Police Visibility: Privacy, Surveillance, and the False Promise of Body-Worn Cameras, I refer to this unintended consequence as collateral visibility. There was no need to make these civilians visible, but the law combined with these cameras did just that. The most desperate moments of citizens lives became available to anyone who wanted to watch on social media.
Police Train To Be Social Workers Of Last Resort
States require more de-escalation and mental health training to avoid police shootings.
Applicants for federal body-camera grants must include policies with their applications, according to Justice Department spokeswoman Tannyr Watkins. The program awarded $73 million to more than 400 agencies from 2015 to 2019.
The National Institute of Justice and the FBI have published general guidelines on body-worn cameras. So has the International Association of Chiefs of Police, which supports body-worn cameras generally but takes the stance that each agency knows how to craft policy best for its community, according to Julie Parker, spokeswoman for the association.
Don’t Miss: Does Police Report Automatically Go To Insurance
Increased Public Confidence In Policing
Cato Institute indicates that the vast majority of Americans support mandatory use of body cameras by police officers, with some 53 percent strongly in favor of them. Body cameras are primarily seen as one way to inspire accountability in police forces around the country.
Such visible displays of transparency do affect the public perception and confidence of police officers. Although they dont singlehandedly address the challenges of policing a population, the adoption of body cameras, more often than not, serves as a first step to developing better relations with a community.
Oscar Grant Research Paper
Including new policy that could help prevent this action of police brutality against unarmed individuals by increasing police training on de-escalating situations verbally before becoming physically aggressive. Change in policy could enforce more penalties for officers who carelessly do not recognize the difference between their Taser and gun or the difference between a suspect walking home with candy wearing a hoodie from one walking from a crime scene wearing a hoodie. Public relations could increase community activities or involvement that include the police force in a positive
Recommended Reading: How To Become A Metro Police Officer
Rotten Apple Theory Of Police Brutality
The Rotten Apple Theory. Police departments use the Rotten Apple Theory to describe police deviance, police gratuity, kickbacks, bribery, and shakedowns of business owners . According to the Christopher Commissions article on police crimes, it stated that white police officers were somewhat more likely to use excessive force against African Americans and watchdog groups like the American Civil Liberties Unions .
Essay On Body Cameras
Another alternative to decrease police misconduct is through the use of body cameras which would hold officers accountable for their actions. Often, commanding officers exercise little supervision over the daily activities of their officers. Not only do officers patrol alone, but they are authorized to quickly create solutions and sanctions on the spot. This provides officers the freedom to get away with both minor and major violations to outright crimes. A tactic to prevent this from occurring is to mount body cameras on officers while on duty.
Read Also: What You Need To Do To Be A Police Officer
Body Cameras Research Paper
Are body cameras an invasion of privacy to the officers and to the public? Do they help when civilians make false accusations against officers? These are the types of questions that are frequently asked about body cameras. In today ‘s society, many citizens believe that the use of body cameras is in invasion of privacy, while others think they can be really helpful.
Essay On Should Police Officers Wear Body Cameras
Should Our Police Officers Be Recorded?Growing up was a little boy who had a dream that wanted to become a hero, a hero that helps and save lives, a hero that is willing to a take risk for his country. A hero willing to save their family and friends . A Police officer was made to enforce the law, to serve and protect from crime and to stop all the killing and the violence. As soon start to get a little older,started to understand more and seeing them on the news saw the police were killing citizens
Also Check: How Do I Send An Anonymous Tip To The Police
Bwcs Encourage Better Behavior From Police And Citizens
-
Though results are mixed, there is some evidence that the presence of a camera may reduce use of force. If officers turned cameras on and off during their shift then use-of-force increased, whereas if they kept the cameras rolling for their whole shift, use-of-force decreased. RAND Corporation
-
In a 2013 study about single police department, complaints against officers dropped an astonishing 88% when body cameras were used. Furthermore, use of force incidents dropped 50%, reducing the risk of physical injury to both officers and the public. Journal of Quantitative Criminology
-
In some studies, BWCs also lead to a decrease in low-level citations however, lowlevel arrests were unaffected. Journal of Community Psychology
Body Camera Footage Is Great For Training
Real-life examples are the most effective training material for anyone in a high-stress, high-stakes job with significant responsibility. Modern body cameras frequently include audio, making them valuable additions to training programs for police officers. By studying what experienced officers did right or wrong in a particular instance, new officers can accelerate their training with mental rehearsal to get off on the right foot.
Police video devices like the Panasonic Arbitrator offer unparalleled image quality, a 70-degree wide-angle view, and magnification up to 220x. That makes it easier than ever for police forces to collect video to improve the quality of the training they offer recruits.
You May Like: How To File A Police Report For Credit Card Theft
Police Body Cameras Pros And Cons
Police should wear body cameras because they can improve the public view of police by showing the human side which can help to provide evidence when a person may not be able to, and it protects both parties which both are a vital part of policing. Police officers should be required to wear body cameras so that their use of force can be documented and judged. It’s time to think about what measures can be put into place to hold all law enforcement accountable. As a person who has had two friends experience police brutality at the hands of the police it’s time to enforce the wearing of the body cameras. Police in every state should agree on letting officers wear an on officer recording system, or body cams that are the size of a ink pen that can be attached to hats, helmets, or collars of their uniforms.
Body Cameras Act As An Unbiased Witness Which Can Increase Accountability For Misconduct
-
Proponents of police body cameras argue that video can provide an unambiguous, unbiased, and accurate record of police encounters in court cases. For example, a University of Cincinnati police officer shot an unarmed man in the head during a traffic stop. The officer then claimed that he was dragged down the street and used force as a means of self defense, which the video footage later disproved. The incident provides an example of how useful body camera footage can be to officials investigating allegations of police misconduct. CATO Institute
-
In the age of social media and recording, the cameras provide an additional viewpoint. Frontline officers are growing increasingly wary of being videotaped while on duty and it has become abundantly clear that citizens will film police even if the police themselves are not filming their own actions. Given this observation, one could certainly question why more departments have not implemented BWCs to give a second lens viewpoint of policecitizen encounters. Police Quarterly
Recommended Reading: How Do You Know If Someone Filed A Police Report
Police Body Camera Use In The United States
| Nonprofit regulation |
|---|
Police body-worn cameras are “small video camerastypically attached to an officer’s clothing, helmet, or sunglassesthat can capture, from an officer’s point of view, video and audio recordings of activities, including traffic stops, arrests, searches, interrogations, and critical incidents such as officer-involved shootings.”Proponents argue that police body camera programs increase police accountability, thereby strengthening the public trust. Proponents in law enforcement also say that body cameras are helpful in evidence collection and protection. Opponents argue that these programs pose risks to individual privacy, may hamper the efforts of law enforcement, and are costly.
HIGHLIGHTS
Requiring The Usage Of Body Cameras In Law Enforcement
Police worn body cameras is a current issue in America today, throughout the nation. Implementing police body cameras, with certain regulations and restrictions, would benefit all parties involved . Suspects who are victims of police brutality would be provided with evidence to take to court, and innocent police officers who
Read Also: Can The Police Unlock My Car
Police Officers Should Wear Body Cameras
Take a Stand: Police Officers Should Wear Body Cameras Police officers are portrayed as the protectors of the people, the men and women who fight to keep our communities safe, but that image is often blurred when there is a victim involved. In order to guarantee a more efficient justice system, many people turn to look for alternatives to help find answers to unknown questions when settling disputes between police officers and victims. Due to recent incidents of innocent lives lost, police officers should be required to wear body cameras on duty in order to ensure a decrease in misconceptions between the public and the police. By requiring officers to wear body cameras, public outrage can succumb, officers will be able to do their jobs better,
Cds Empowers Police Officers With Next
The pros and cons of police body cameras are heavily argued in public discourse, but many people overlook the practical advantages that this technology offers to the officers. From improving safety to decreasing paperwork time, body cameras do much more than train a watchful eye on police and civilians. CDS is proud to work with local police departments to develop the right set of tools to help them become productive, trusted community guardians.
CDS is a specialist in Panasonic police technology. Contact us now to discuss your departments challenges and safety policies.
Also Check: What Qualifications Do You Need To Be A Police Officer
Should Police Officers Wear Body Cameras Essay
Having a video for a case will be a great evidence to prove someone is guilty or innocent. Not only its very helpful towards a case but it will also show the police officers behavior towards other people. It will also help citizens attitude and behavior towards the officers or people Even though it will invade their privacy but this will help maintain a good condition towards the
How Do Police Body Cameras Work
Police body cameras are being used nation and even worldwide more and more. These tiny devices record anything from traffic stops to the most intense crime scenes. The footage is a valuable resource in the police department and can be used for so many beneficial purposes. Police body cameras should be worn by all police
Recommended Reading: Can Anyone Get A Police Report
Will The Footage Be Public
It’s not clear.
According to the bill, the Council on Police Training has to create rules around how the cameras are used, including whether to let the public see the footage. The council has to present the rules to Attorney General Jennings by Jan. 15.
Jennings, a Democrat, supports public access to footage, except in certain circumstances such as interviews with children or sexual assault victims.
Patrick Ogden, head of the Council of Police Chiefs, said he cannot comment on whether he supports making the footage public because he will chair the committee creating the policy.
“But I anticipate that under certain circumstances that chiefs will have the ability to release video to the public,” Ogden said.
Isabel Hughes and Jeff Neiburg contributed to this report.
Sir Robert Peel Principles In Law Enforcement
This is an important concept because it explains that officers should not follow society and pressure from the public and media but follow the laws that our country. This a good thing to have when dealing with persuasive criminals and individuals. Both officers and civilians benefit from this principle because it protects both parties. Officers also need to know the laws, so they can stay away form trouble and not be deceived by public persuasion. This is a good thing to have in America today, because many criminals will say anything to get out of punishment.
Also Check: How To Search Police Reports For Free