Wednesday, September 28, 2022

Can You Sue An Individual Police Officer

Don't Miss

We Help Our Clients With Their Legal Needs By Connecting Them With Skilled Attorneys

North Texas man files lawsuit against 2 Keller police officers after August arrest

This Week We Have Connected 433 People! You Can Be the Next One!

The Fourth Amendment of the US Constitution protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure. The amendment places limits on police conduct. Unfortunately, that doesnt stop a few cops from crossing the line.

This explains why Can I sue the police department for violating my rights? is a common question that people who have had negative encounters with police officers ask. The short answer is yes. It is within your constitutional rights to sue the police department for misconduct.

While it is not going to be easy to file a lawsuit against the police department, you shouldnt feel intimidated or hopeless when a police officer violates your rights. In this post, we explore the options you have with regards to suing the police department and what you need to do to win the case.

Read on to find out everything you need to know about suing individual police officers or the police department.

How Can Police Actions Lead To Section 1983 Liability

When you file a Section 1983 lawsuit, you will have to prove: Your Constitutional rights were violated in some way. The violation was done by a person acting under color of state law, and. You suffered an injury as a result of that persons actions.

When Are Ohio Police Immune In Excessive Force And Civil Rights Cases

Another technical legal hurdle for victims of police misconduct involves whether the government can even be sued at all.

Under a doctrine known as qualified immunity, police and other government officials cannot be sued in their personal capacities unless they violated a constitutional right, and the right was clearly established in the eyes of the law. At its core, this means the official be sued only if a reasonable person should have known that what they were doing was unconstitutional. A claim of qualified immunity is very common in § 1983 cases, and it can take an experienced Ohio civil rights lawyer to defeat the defense.

Some government officials enjoy even greater immunity than that. For example, judges generally cannot be sued at all for their decisions. They have what is known as absolute immunity. So long as the judge had the legal power to render a decisioneven if wrong or unfairthe judge cannot be sued for it. Acts outside the traditional judicial role are not immune though. With that in mind, a judge would not be immune for something like a physical assault.

You May Like: Can You Sue A Police Officer Personally

What Type Of Evidence Will I Need To Prove My Section 1983 Claim

The best type of evidence that you can present to prove your case often includes video footage and photographs of the government officials negligent act. The one similarity among many recent high-profile cases is video footage of the negligent act. Videos often come from bystanders in the right place at the right time, ready to document the encounters.

Take the example of 37-year-old Abdul Salaam, who filed a civil lawsuit against the Baltimore Police Department for injuries he suffered at the hands of several police officers. Once the officers had approached Salaams car, as Salaam was rolling down his window, they yanked him out. The officers then dragged him across the ground while his son watched, traumatized, from the car. Salaam suffered facial, neck, and shoulder injuries. Several neighbors on the street took footage of the events with their cellphones. At trial, Salaams attorney told the jury that they would see the videos, and asked them to pay close attention. The jury came back with a verdict of $70,000 for Salaam. Video footage can go a long way toward proving your case before a jury.

Contact A Philadelphia Police Brutality Lawyer Today

Claim Compensation Police : Four reasons why your Ohio Workers ...

Have you or your loved one been the victim of police brutality in Philadelphia? If so, you probably have questions about how to obtain compensation for your injuries. Pursuing a personal injury lawsuit against the police officer personally and the police department can help you and your family financially. Successful plaintiffs are entitled to compensation for their past and future medical expenses, lost income due to their injuries, and property damage related to the incident.

Successful plaintiffs are also entitled to non-economic damages for the pain and suffering caused by the police brutality they endured. At Abramson & Denenberg, P.C., We have a proven track record of holding police officers personally responsible for the injuries they inflict on our clients. We understand the local and federal laws governing police brutality lawsuits. We also have the trial experience and negotiation experience necessary to secure the best possible outcome in your case. Contact us today to schedule your free initial consultation.

Also Check: How Old Can You Be To Be A Police Officer

What Constitutes Police Misconduct In Colorado

Now that you have a better understanding of police misconduct and federal protections in Colorado, its important to look at what exactly constitutes police misconduct. In other words, how do you know if the polices actions were a violation of your rights? Unfortunately, some cases of police misconduct are not very clear was the individual resisting arrest, or was the police officer being excessive in his/her use of force?

There are some ways to determine whether the polices actions constituted misconduct. The most common claims of police misconduct, however, include:

What Are Civil Actions Against The Police

Civil actions against the police are claims for compensation made through the judicial system.

The use of tort law allows citizens who have been subject to the abuse of the polices extensive powers to sue the police.

These civil claims are made by people who have been wronged by the police in some way, for example:

When suing the police, victims of police misconduct instruct solicitors, such as Donoghue Solicitors, to investigate their civil claims. They will usually seek compensation and a contribution towards their legal costs.

Depending on the circumstances the police may also apologise for their actions, destroy DNA and personal data, correct records on the Police National Computer etc.

Civil actions against the police are different from complaints against the police where the aim is for the police to effectively conduct internal disciplinary matters.

You May Like: How Long Is The Academy For Police

The Law In Civil Actions Against The Police

Civil actions against the police can be complicated and should only be undertaken by specialists in the field.

For that reason, if you want help to sue the police, contact Donoghue Solicitors on 08000 124 246, or complete the online form on this page.

Before continuing, please note our Terms and Conditions, and in particular, Section 4 Disclaimers.

Read on for a detailed explanation of the law in civil actions against the police.

Kevin Donoghue, Director of Donoghue Solicitors, explains the law in civil actions against the police.

A Guide To Accident Claims For Police Misconduct

SCOTUS Rules Police Officers Can’t Be Sued For Miranda Warning Violation

Police Negligence

Police negligence and misconduct can often have a lasting impact on a persons life. Whether youre assaulted by an officer in the UK physically or verbally, been discriminated against or perhaps been the victim of a miscarriage of justice, you can make police negligence claims.

This guide informs you of everything you need to know about claims made for police negligence compensation, what to do if you are a victim of police misconduct, and how to begin launching your police misconduct claims.

Read Also: How Much Are Police Body Cameras

Speak To The Police Protective Liability Insurance Experts

Reach out to the experts at John M. Glover Insurance Agency for more information on personally suing police officers. Since our founding in 1916, we have been dedicated to serving the insurance needs of clients throughout Connecticut, New Jersey, New York, Massachusetts, and Hawaii. As an independent agency, we work closely with several insurers that have proven their stability and reliability over the years.

At JMG, we understand that enforcing the law and protecting the public is risky. Therefore, we provide police officers and other law enforcement officials with protective liability insurance. This type of policy covers damages resulting from property damage, bodily injury, or personal injury arising from a wrongful act. In the event a lawsuit is brought against an officer, this policy will also help cover the associated legal fees. We offer policies providing $100,000 and $250,000 in coverage.

Can You Sue For Police Misconduct

Law enforcement officers have a dangerous job protecting communities and keeping people safe. The people who serve as police officers have a difficult job, and many of them are professionals who treat citizens fairly and equally. However, some officers abuse that power and dishonor their uniforms. Police officers are not above the law, and if youve been a victim of police abuse, you might wonder if you can sue the police. Use this guide to learn the answer to this question and others involving police abuse.

Recommended Reading: How To Become A Police Officer In Tulsa Oklahoma

S To Take When Suing A Traffic Police Officer

The first step when seeking to take legal action against a traffic police officer is to hire a highly experienced lawyer. Many lawsuits against public officials fail because the government has resources to hire the best defense lawyers. Therefore, go for a highly experienced attorney who has dealt with cases against public officials or high profile individuals.

Secondly, preserve as much evidence as you can. You should expect the traffic policeman to fabricate lies against you therefore, make sure you build your case on solid evidence.

The next thing you ought to do before you take your case to court is to file complaints with the police department, anti-corruption commission, or IPOA, depending on your claims. If no action is taken against the traffic policeman, these complaints will act as strong evidence.

Finally, your lawyer will file a legal claim in court. The court will set a date to hear your case and if you fail to settle, the case will go to trial. After the trial, the court will rule on whether your claim was valid, what compensation you should get, and how to punish the traffic policeman.

Lastly, do you have any question about this post or something else? We are responding. Ask us a question or register to join 235k+ subscribers that receive latest education news.

Do I Need An Attorney To Help Me If I Want To Sue The Police

For many police, only truly compliant person a dead one

It is very important that you contact a criminal attorney if you think you might have a claim against a police officer or police department. It is critical that you gather and preserve as much evidence as possible.

An experienced criminal attorney can assist you throughout the entire process, from gathering evidence and interviewing witnesses, to negotiating with the defendant and representing you in court.

Also Check: How Many Black People Were Killed By Police In 2020

Misfeasance In Public Office

There is an overlap between misfeasance in public office and malicious prosecution in civil actions against the police.

If there is no malicious prosecution claim, because for example, reasonable and probable cause cannot be shown, or where the alleged bad faith is not malice in its classical sense, the tort of misfeasance in public office may be appropriate .

What is misfeasance in public office?

Misfeasance in public office can be defined as a civil tort pursued against the holder of a public office following the misuse or abuse of power.

The Three Rivers DC v Bank of England case set out the test to show misfeasance in public office as follows:

  • the person whose conduct is in question is a public officer, and the conduct was an exercise of his or her power in that capacity
  • s/he intended to injure the claimant by the exercise of that power, or knowingly/ recklessly acted in excess of that power
  • the officer knew that the act would probably cause damage of the kind actually caused.
  • The second part of this test means that the tort requires bad faith on the part of the officer. A mistake is not enough.

    Bad faith can arise in two ways:

  • When the officer deliberately exercises his or her powers to injure a person and
  • When Can I Sue The Police

    There are certain circumstances in which the police might have violated your rights and put you in the position to file a lawsuit. Suing the police is one option available to you if those officers have engaged in misconduct that violated your constitutional rights. It can be very difficult to succeed in these kinds of lawsuits, but it definitely is possible. A victim of police misconduct should engage an attorney sooner rather than later to walk through all of their possible steps and determine what to do next.

    There are several different kinds of examples of police behavior that might be classified as misconduct. These can include police brutality, actions of corruption, perjury, falsification of evidence, racial profiling, false arrest, coercion, fraud, imprisonment, abuse of authority, spoilation of evidence, and sexual or physical assault. However, certain kinds of police misconduct claims are more common than others. It is also possible that based on the specifics of your individual case you have more than one police misconduct claim.

    Don’t Miss: Where To File Police Report For Identity Theft

    Largest Police Wrongful Death Settlements

    The vast majority of police shooting cases are settled before they ever get to trial. Heres a look at some of the largest police shooting settlements in our country’s history:

  • George Floyd . On May 25, 2020, the family of George Floyd, a 46-year-old man killed by Derek Chauvin, a Minnesota police officer who knelt on Georges neck and back for 9 minutes and 29 seconds, reached a settlement with the City of Minneapolis for $27 million.
  • Bettie R. Jones . Bettie R. Jones, a 55-year-old woman, was accidentally shot by a Chicago police officer on December 26, 2015, while trying to help the officer. The city ultimately settled with Betties family for $16 million.
  • Breonna Taylor . On March 13, 2020, Breonna Taylor, a 26-year-old woman, was shot to death in her bed by officers acting on a no-knock warrant. In September, the Louisville Metro Government agreed to pay Breonnas estate $12 million to settle a wrongful death claim.
  • Police misconduct settlements

    In Which Supreme Court Case Was Section 1983 Applied To The Police

    RAW: Footage of man wrongfully arrested by Loveland Police wins $290,000 lawsuit

    The doctrine of qualified immunity has changed substantially over the years, but it was first articulated in the 1967 Supreme Court case Pierson v. Ray. That case involved a Section 1983 suit against police officers who had arrested several people under an antiloitering statute that violated the First Amendment.

    Also Check: What Do Police Use To Track Cell Phones

    What Is The Justification For Qualified Immunity

    Most people believe that if you do something unlawful, you should be held accountable.

    So why do we make a limited exception for law enforcement and government officials?

    The U.S. Supreme Court did its best to explain the justification for qualified immunity in Harlow. The Court explained that qualified immunity seeks to achieve a balance between holding officials accountable and minimizing the social costs associated with suing government officials.

    The 4 social costs identified by the Court were as follows:

  • The expense of litigating frivolous lawsuits
  • The diversion of official energy from pressing public issues
  • The deterrence of capable citizens from choosing to enter government positions
  • The inability of officials to carry out their duties without fear of personal liability or harassing litigation
  • Proponents of qualified immunity often point to the last social cost. Proponents, for example, are quick to argue that the looming threat of even baseless lawsuits will cause police officers to hesitate when they have to make a split-second or life-and-death decision.

    Along these lines, the U.S. Supreme Court argued:

    Qualified immunity gives government officials breathing room to make reasonable but mistaken judgments about open legal questions. When properly applied, it protects all but the plainly incompetent or those who knowingly violate the law.

    When Is A Constitutional Right Clearly Established

    Police cannot invoke the qualified immunity doctrine if they violated a right that was clearly established. It has to be clearly established at the time of the violation.

    What makes a constitutional right clearly established is up for debate.13 The Supreme Court has made conflicting statements about it. At best, the court has provided a general rule of thumb. A right is clearly established if a police officer had fair notice of it.14

    However, police officers often stress that there are no laws that prohibit exactly what they did. Victims often have to show that the officers conduct was prohibited by a more general rule.

    Example: An FBI agent searches a home without a warrant. The victims of the search claim it was an unreasonable search that violated their Fourth Amendment civil liberties. Law enforcement claims that the case involves particular details involving a constitutional question that have never been decided, before.15

    You May Like: What Training Is Required To Be A Police Officer

    The Officer’s Defense: Qualified Immunity

    But it is not that simple. The major obstacle to recovery under section 1983 â and an enormous obstacle it is â is the doctrine of qualified immunity. Qualified immunity, which was established by the Supreme Court in 1967, is a defense that protects police officers from personal liability unless they violate âclearly established” statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.

    Courts have construed this defense broadly. So broadly, in fact, that you essentially have to show that either the Supreme Court or the United States Court of Appeals for the federal district in which you are located has ruled in the victim’s factor in a case just like yours. Similar isn’t enough. It’s got to be virtually the same.

    That is really hard to do. In fact, a Reuters investigative study revealed that the qualified immunity defense barred recovery in most section 1983 claims. So even if you can make out your section 1983 claim, you have a tough fight in front of you if you choose to sue a police officer. But while qualified immunity makes a section 1983 claim hard to win, it’s not impossible. That is why it’s important to speak to an experienced civil rights attorney to discuss whether you have a legitimate case.

    More articles

    Popular Articles